GUEST ROOM | Prof. Grossman’s Framing is Incomplete and Misleading

GUEST ROOM | Prof. Grossman’s Framing is Incomplete and Misleading

Re: GROSSMAN | Let Us Show Compassion and Understanding for Each Other (opinion, May 2) 

Dear Prof. Grossman, values of compassion and understanding comprise the essence of the anti-war student protests. Thus, while your piece is noble, its framing is incomplete and misleading. When you say students are using “hateful words,” you forget two important issues: First, holding students accountable for some of the “hateful” words used, requires holding the dissenting side to the same standard. Second, diverting the discussion from the essence of the protests (i.e., ceasefire and divestment from weapons’ companies to some of the phrases used) is an act of bad faith. 

1. Full accountability for hate: Presenting one case of so-called hate and ignoring the dissenting bloc dramatically weakens your credibility. I have witnessed a number of hateful practices employed here on campus. First, the dissenting bloc set out in a vicious doxing campaign against pro-Palestinians or anti-war protests — the main reason why pro-Palestinian activists wear masks. You failed to include that in your framing.